Next: Visible Elements of
 Up: Visibility
 Previous: Visibility
Visible Elements of 
In [Maz99], Mazur introduced the following definition. 
Let 
 be an abelian variety over an arbitrary field 
.  
Definition  1.1   
Let 

be an embedding of 

 into an abelian variety 

 over 

.
Then the 
visible subgroup of 
 with respect 
to the embedding 
 is
        
 
The visible subgroup 
 depends on the choice of
embedding 
, but we do not include 
 in the notation, as
it is usually clear from context.
The Galois cohomology group 
 has a geometric interpretation
as the group of classes of torsors 
 for 
 (see [LT58]).
To a cohomology class 
, there is a corresponding
variety 
 over 
 and a map 
 that satisfies axioms
similar to those for a simply transitive group action.  The set of
equivalence classes of such 
 forms a group, the Weil-Chatelet group
of 
, which is canonically isomorphic to 
.
There is a close relationship between visibility and the geometric
interpretation of Galois cohomology.  Suppose 
 is an
embedding and 
.  We have an exact sequence of
abelian varieties 
, where 
.  A piece of
the associated long exact sequence of Galois cohomology is
so there is an exact sequence
  | 
(1.1) | 
 
Thus there is a point 
 that maps to 
.  The fiber 
over 
 is a subvariety of 
, which, when equipped with its natural
action of 
, lies in the class of torsors corresponding to 
.
This is the origin of the terminology ``visible''.  Also, we remark
that when 
 is a number field, 
 is finite 
because it is torsion 
and is the surjective image of the finitely generated group 
.
 
 
   
 Next: Visible Elements of
 Up: Visibility
 Previous: Visibility
William A Stein
2002-02-27