First note that the mod representation
attached to
is irreducible because
is semistable and admits no
-isogeny (according
to [Cre]).
The newform attached to
is
Consider the elliptic curve defined by
.
Using Cremona's programs tate and mwrank we find that
has conductor
, and that
.
The Tamagawa numbers of
at
,
, and
are
,
, and
, respectively.
The newform attached to
is
Finally, we apply Theorem 3.1 with ,
,
,
, and
. It
is routine to check the hypothesis. For example,
the hypothesis that
has no
-rational
-torsion
can be checked as follows.
Cremona's online tables imply that
admits no
-isogeny,
so
is irreducible. Since
is isogenous to
,
the representation
is also irreducible, so
.
Thus, by Theorem 3.1, we have
To finish the proof, note that