In case (1) we defined the normalized valuation to be the one such that if Haar measure of the ring of integers is , then (see Definition 17.1.11). In case (2i) we say that is normalized if it is the ordinary absolute value, and in (2ii) if it is the square of the ordinary absolute value:
We have already verified the above characterization for non-archimedean valuations, and it is clear for the ordinary absolute value on , so it remains to verify it for . The additive group is topologically isomorphic to , so a choice of Haar measure of is the usual area measure on the Euclidean plane. Multiplication by is the same as rotation followed by scaling by a factor of , so if we rescale a region by a factor of , the area of the region changes by a factor of the square of . This explains why the normalized valuation on is the square of the usual absolute value. Note that the normalized valuation on does not satisfy the triangle inequality:
By the preceding section there is a positive real number such that for all we have
One can argue in a unified way in all cases as follows. Let be a basis for . Then the map
Let . Then the left-multiplication-by- map
In the case when need not be complete with respect to the valuation on , we have the following theorem.
What next?! We'll building up to giving a new proof of finiteness of the class group that uses that the class group naturally has the discrete topology and is the continuous image of a compact group.
William Stein 2004-05-06