In case (1) we defined the normalized valuation to
be the one such that if Haar measure of the ring of integers is
,
then
(see Definition 17.1.11).
In case (2i) we say that
is normalized if it is the ordinary
absolute value, and in (2ii) if it is the square of the ordinary
absolute value:
We have already verified the above characterization for
non-archimedean valuations, and it is clear for the ordinary absolute
value on
, so it remains to verify it for
. The additive
group
is topologically isomorphic to
, so a
choice of Haar measure of
is the usual area measure on the
Euclidean plane. Multiplication by
is the same as
rotation followed by scaling by a factor of
, so if we
rescale a region by a factor of
, the area of the region changes
by a factor of the square of
. This explains why the
normalized valuation on
is the square of the usual absolute
value. Note that the normalized valuation on
does not satisfy
the triangle inequality:
By the preceding section there is a positive real number
such that for all
we have
One can argue in a unified way in all cases as follows.
Let
be a basis for
. Then the map
Let . Then the left-multiplication-by-
map
In the case when need not be complete with respect
to the valuation
on
, we have the following
theorem.
What next?! We'll building up to giving a new proof of finiteness of the class group that uses that the class group naturally has the discrete topology and is the continuous image of a compact group.
William Stein 2004-05-06