Today is 2006-01-18.
Quiz reminder: Friday, Jan 20 (describe format) How was your weekend? Mine was great--I wrote open source math software nonstop for days on end! |

This section is about how to compute the area of fairly general regions in the plane. Regions are often described as the area enclosed by the graphs of several curves. (``My land is the plot enclosed by that river, that fence, and the highway.'')

Recall that the integral
has a geometric
interpretation as the signed area between the graph of and the
-axis. We defined area by subdividing, adding up approximate areas
(use points in the intervals) as *Riemann sum*, and taking the limit.
Thus we defined area as a limit of Riemann sums. The fundamental
theorem of calculus asserts that we can compute areas exactly when
we can finding antiderivatives.

Instead of considering the area between the graph of
and the -axis, we consider more generally two graphs,
, , and assume for simplicity that
on an interval .
Again, we approximate the area *between* these two
curves as before using Riemann sums.
Each approximating rectangle has width and height
, so

Area bounded by graphs

Note that
, so the area is nonnegative.
From the definition of integral we see that the exact area is
Why did we make a big deal about approximations instead of just
writing down (3.1.1)? Because having a sense of how
this area comes directly from a Riemann sum is very important. But,
what is the point of the Riemann sum if all we're going to do is write
down the integral? The sum embodies the geometric manifestation of
the integral. If you have this picture in your mind, then the Riemann
sum has *done its job*. If you understand this, you're more
likely to know what
integral to write down; if you don't, then you might not.